I ended up seeing three patients, all of whom presented by smacking their heads on hard surfaces. I’ve changed their names and ages to protect the innocent, and to avoid the wrath of Hungry Hungry HIPAA.
10 year old after a bike accident
The first patient was a school aged male whose bike failed him, and whose helmet was hanging in his garage. He ended up introducing his occiput to the pavement, though his recollection of this event was foggy at best. His sensorium was mired in the same fog.
7 month old infant falls from mom’s arms
The second was an infant, who despite her mother’s best efforts, wriggled free from her arms and fell to the concrete below. The baby cried immediately, and aside from the large hematoma on her forehead, looked great.
2 ½ year old hit head on concrete – two days ago
Sensing a theme, you might wager that the third cranium contacted concrete in a concussive cacophony (sorry about the alliteration). It did, but 2 days ago. A visit to an urgent care, and a ‘medical’ neighbor later – had filled the family with enough information to seek care at my ED as they wondered whether or not their robust toddler needed a head CT.
There is a delicate balance between managing the anxieties and expectations of a parent, when they are (justly so) legitimately worried about their child’s well-being. Perhaps they are a medical professional themselves, and armed with just enough (mis)information to make them worry more than they should. Or maybe, they consulted Dr. Google, or worse, Dr. Facebook in that back alley clinic that would make Dr. Nick Riviera of the Simpson’s blush.
Go ahead and think for a moment about whether or not you would order a head CT on each patient (I know you are thinking about the decision to scan in each, as your natural medicine brains will not allow you to avoid pursuing a diagnoses). But, hopefully this post will instead stimulate you to think about another very important question. Namely, how do you summarize the literature for an anxious, perhaps tearful family, and how do you communicate your recommendations to them, given the evidence that suggests when to scan, in the face of mounting concerns about the exposure to ionizing radiation.
In order: Yes, maybe, & no. The first patient has ongoing symptoms and a significant mechanism of injury. For the infant, I would usually start with a plain skull film. As you know these can pick up linear skull fx missed b/w cuts of CT. Then CT if + for fx. The toddler would be no, and I’ve usually not had probs reassuring parents regarding nearly nonexistent risk of ICH regarding time involved.
BTW love your site & posts!
-Laura Snyder, MD, FAAP, FACEP
Thanks for the response and encouraging feedback!